December 2009

The Curse of the Ruling Classes

Let’s start with an observation that should by now be axiomatic: All bosses are overpaid. And most of them are insulated from and clueless about the way their attitude and privilege come off to the rest of the world.  If we could all just agree to this truth that is even older than rapacious capitalism, we could get past the reddest herring in the debate about higher education in Washington State.  

In a recent editorial in the Seattle Times, Nicole Brodeur lent her indignant voice to the chorus of moaning about UW President Mark Emmert’s millions and Provost Phyllis Wise’s new gig moonlighting for Nike.  After President Emmert dropped by the Times to talk about the latest round of cuts to Washington’s universities, Ms. Brodeur was compelled to write:

Image

“I sat there and listened to Emmert lament the cuts that would come, the students who would suffer. The diversity that would die. The futures dashed.

“But all I could think about was Emmert's $905,000 annual compensation; the second highest among public university presidents nationally.” 

That’s a bit like listening to the weatherman tell you about the hurricane that’s coming and refusing to evacuate because he’s wearing a nice suit.  

The message isn’t wrong just because the messenger is arrogant or tone deaf. Whatever else Mark Emmert may or may not be, he’s dead right about the impact of draconian cuts to university budgets on opportunity and economic vitality in this state.  Unless something dramatic happens to turn things around, Washington’s universities will become increasingly smaller and more private and Washington’s citizens will be put at more and more of a disadvantage in the competition for Washington’s best jobs.  

Brodeur and all the others who want to scapegoat the UW president always make the childish connection between Emmert’s swag and the rising costs of going to college, suggesting that if top administrators were just paid less then university budget problems would go away and everyone could afford to go to college.  

Well, do the math:  There are six university presidents in this state.  None of the rest of them make Emmert’s money, but they’re all living very well and they all get houses and country club memberships.  If you sacked all of them tomorrow you would save the state about $3 million dollars.  (You would, of course, be left with a bunch of universities without presidents, but let’s not quibble.)  Throw in the housing allowances and the cars and the golf and maybe you’re up to $4 million.  

Last year the legislature cut state support to Washington’s universities by $400 million. The governor’s recently released budget is proposing to cut them by another $46 million this year.   Presidential salaries are just a drop in an oil drum.  If Emmert had responded to the many calls to give back some of his salary, it would have been a purely symbolic gesture.  (And as long as we’re looking for pointless conversations, we could debate which presidential gesture was more hubristic, Emmert’s coy assertion that “everything” was on the table when he had no intention of cutting his salary, or Washington State University President Elson Floyd’s pious give-back of a hundred grand at the same time that he was making sure that WSU students will no longer be able to study Theatre or German.) 

The cost of public universities has not gone up because of outlandish executive salaries, and it has not gone up because of the salaries of university faculty and staff, which have struggled to keep pace with inflation.  It has gone up almost solely because the state has been relentlessly redefining public university education as a private good.  State support for state universities has been steadily declining over the past 15 years and precipitously declining in the last two years.  

Ironically, it is exactly this declining state support that has led to the need for CEO-type presidents.  In the early to mid-twentieth century, when public universities were still for the public and still about education and research, the college president was still an academic who didn’t get that much more than everyone else on the faculty.  He (and in those days it was always he) had to clean up O.K. and know which fork to use, but mostly the job was running the university.  As universities have become more and more entwined with corporations and less and less supported by the state, the job of president shifted more and more toward the external.  As universities are forced to become more and more like businesses, regents and trustees are forced to go looking for corporate rainmakers to run them.  The best way to keep executive compensation under control would be to restore the public funding that would allow public universities to operate more like universities and less like corporations.  

Public universities in Washington are on the brink of not being public any more.  The universities were cut disproportionately last year and the governor’s proposed higher education cuts for this year again slice deeper into the universities than the community colleges.  The decisions made in this legislative session about taxes, funding, tuition, and financial aid will have a profound impact on students for generations to come.  We have serious problems and we need serious people trying to solve them.  What we don’t need is a lot of distracting bluster about Mark Emmert’s tax bracket.  Let’s hope that our legislative and media friends don’t waste a lot of time grandstanding about the banal fact that all bosses are overpaid. 

Chickens Coming Home to Roost

In the spirit of moving on, we’ll resist the temptation to point a finger back toward what Representative Brendan Williams calls the “Bill for Political Cowardice” about revenue and the “immoral all-cuts budget last session.”  What’s done is done.

So yesterday Governor Gregoire released her required “Book One” all-cuts supplemental budget and then immediately began denouncing it.  This time, with state services on the verge of completely disappearing, taxes are on the table.   

The governor’s budget proposes using $900 million from the “rainy day” fund (the real rainy day fund this time, not the universities as rainy day fund) and cutting about $1.7 billion from state services to cover the current $2.6 billion deficit.  In the press conference following the budget release, the governor said she would like to buy back some of those cuts with about $700 million in new taxes.  That still leaves about a billion dollars in cuts.  So if you’re a Washington citizen looking for human services or an education, you’re not out of the woods yet. 

The proposed new cuts to higher education come in two forms: a dramatic reduction to the State Need Grant and substantial cuts to university and college operating budgets.  The $146.4 million slice off the Need Grant would kick about 12,300 students out of the program and reduce the payment to those left by about 50%.  In her press conference, the governor specifically mentioned this program as one she wanted to buy back with new revenues. 

She did not, however, say anything about trying to reduce the cuts to the institutions where students might use those need grants.  So we’re looking at $89.5 million in cuts to our universities and community and technical colleges. 

At first glance, the cuts seem to be divided more or less equally between the two sectors: $45.9 million to the universities and $43.6 million to the community and technical colleges.  But it’s important to remember that this split is being imposed on a base that was wildly skewed in last year’s budget (O.K., maybe we’ll take just one quick look back at last year’s legislative session).  The cuts to four-year higher ed state appropriations were as deep as almost any state agency, while the cuts to community and technical colleges were about a quarter of the cuts to the universities:

Image

It is also important to note that the maintenance-of-effort rules required for last year’s stimulus funding would have limited Governor Gregoire’s cut to higher education to $78 million, which, in a 50-50 split, would have been $39 million to the universities.  But adding $11.5 million in new Worker Retraining spending to the CTCs, the Governor’s budget proposal can then make the cut to higher ed that much higher.  So, while the proposal looks like pain shared between the CTCs and the universities, the alchemy of stimulus rules plus “new spending” plus cuts equals a shift of about $7 million in cuts from the CTCs to the universities.  Here’s hoping that there will actually be jobs for all those retrained workers when they leave those programs.

 As always here at the blog, the point of all this is not to disrespect or denigrate our dedicated and hard-working sisters and brothers at the community and technical colleges.  Like every other state worker at every other state agency, they are struggling to keep this recession from destroying the state. 

The point is that Governor Gregoire’s proposed budget, in keeping with a long tradition in Washington State, has once again chosen training over education.  Washington’s six public universities will be made more private and Washington’s citizens will continue to bump up against an even more impenetrable education system and economic ceiling.

Breakfast With the Regionals

Image

On Thursday morning, fifteen legislators and a member of Governor Gregoire’s staff got up early and scraped the ice off their windshields to join us for bagels and coffee.  They were met by an unprecedented coalition.  No fewer than eleven, count ‘em, eleven presidents were part of the welcoming party:

President James Gaudino of Central Washington University

President Rodolfo Arevalo of Eastern Washington University

President Thomas (Les) Purce of The Evergreen State College

President Bruce Shepard of Western Washington University

President Bob Hickey of The United Faculty of Central

President Gary Krug of The United Faculty of Eastern

President Laurie Meeker of The United Faculty of Evergreen

President Steven Garfinkle of The United Faculty of Western

President Bill Lyne of the United Faculty of Washington State

President Mary Lindquist of The Washington Education Association

President Larry Otos of the Western Washington University Alumni Association

 

Mike Bogatay, the Executive Director of The Washington Student Association, along with several other student leaders were also there. 

 

This coalition of administration, faculty, students, and alumni came together to speak with a single voice about the value of Washington’s Regional Comprehensive Universities.  The legislators who joined us were thoughtful and more than willing to engage in frank conversation about difficult problems.  Our thanks to everyone who was there:

 

Rep. Bill Hinkle

Rep. Larry Haler

Rep. Scott White

Rep. Judy Warnick

Rep. Kathy Haigh (who came out on her birthday—Happy Birthday, Kathy!)

Rep. Phyllis Kenney

Rep. Deb Wallace

Rep. Susan Fagan

Rep. Doug Erickson

Rep. Sam Hunt

Rep. Reuven Carlyle

 

Senator Jim Kastama

Senator Paull Shin

Senator Karen Fraser

Senator Derek Kilmer

 

Leslie Goldstein, the Governor’s expert on all things Higher Ed

 

Once everyone had some coffee and the introductions had been made, the Regional Comprehensive University Coalition made this statement:

  

Where Will Your Constituents’ Children Go To College?

We’ve come together today as the leaders of constituencies that you usually hear from separately.  We are the students, faculty, and administration from Central Washington University, Eastern Washington University, the Evergreen State College, and Western Washington University.  And we are here with a single, unified message.

 

On the invitation to this meeting, we asked the question, Where Will Your Constituents’ Children Go to College?  If things continue in the direction they’re going, the answer to that question will be, Not in This State.

 

We are here to urge you in the strongest possible terms to reinvest in Washington’s four-year universities before it is too late.   

 

It has been our experience that when legislators and other state policy makers think of higher education, the first thing they think of is the University of Washington and the second thing they think of is community and technical colleges.  This makes sense, as UW is a world-class research institution with big-time division one sports programs, and we have a fine community college system and everyone has one in their district.  This bi-polar attention has often left our outstanding regional comprehensive universities out of focus and in the higher ed background. 

 

We’re here today to try to change that a little bit—to put our outstanding regional comprehensive universities in the spotlight.

 

Washington has one of the finest sets of regional comprehensive universities in the country.  We educate 32,000 students from all over the state.  Over ninety percent of our students come from within the state and thus our students are much more likely to stay here once they earn their degrees.  Businesses and employers in Washington and across the country recognize our graduates as extremely well prepared, both in their general education and in their specialties.  Many of our graduates are your colleagues and staff.  Our institutions are major contributors to the economy in Cheney, Spokane, Olympia, Ellensburg, and Bellingham.  We also have programs in Bellevue, Bremerton, Des Moines, Everett, Kent, Lynnwood, Moses Lake, Port Angeles, Seattle, Shoreline, Spokane, Tacoma, Vancouver, Wenatchee, and Yakima.

 

Our universities are among the best educational investments in the country, for both the state and our students.  We rank very high in our retention rates and our six year graduation rates, while at the same time ranking very low in per student and per degree funding.  At the same time we all rank very high in all of the quality surveys and idexes

 

At the heart of this success is our faculty. All of the professors you see here today, along with most of our colleagues, had opportunities at liberal arts colleges and research universities, often at higher salaries, but we chose Central, Eastern, Evergreen, or Western because of the unique opportunities our institutions offered for both committed, excellent teaching and high quality research.  Tenured professors teach at every level of our curriculum—from freshman general education surveys to senior major courses and graduate seminars.  Many of our colleagues at research institutions send their children to our universities because they know they will receive more attention from outstanding faculty in our classes. 

 

And while we are providing the highest quality learning experiences for our students, we are also producing world-class research. We bring millions of dollars each year in research grants to the state.  We provide economic and policy advice and information to a variety of businesses and state agencies.  We bring new understandings of state and world ecosystems.  Our faculty regularly contribute to the arts at the community, state and national level.

 

All of these projects not only contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the economy of our state, they also nourish our teaching and provide our students excellent hands-on research and learning opportunities. 

 

And our students are by far the best testament to the value of our universities.  Our students regularly attend and thrive in the best graduate programs in the country.  And they also go on to be leaders in business, science and the arts. 

 

For your constituents, an opportunity to attend one of our regional comprehensive universities is an opportunity to change their socioeconomic circumstances, to contribute to the community and the state, and to perhaps lead a more fulfilling and useful life.      

 

All of this is now in Great Danger.

 

In the last legislative session, four-year universities bore the brunt of the cuts to higher education and Washington’s cuts to its four-year universities were among the highest in the nation.  Our four institutions saw their state appropriations reduced between 25% and 30%.  For all of our institutions, the state contribution to our budgets is now at or below 50%. 

 

This would have been very bad under any circumstances.  But even before the collapse of the last legislative session, our comprehensive universities were underfunded. 

 

Even before the last legislative session, Washington’s four-year college participation rate ranked 48th in the nation.

 

Even before the bottom fell out, our faculty salaries were in the 30th to 40th percentiles of peers. 

 

Even before we were cut more than almost any other state university system in the country, our per student and per degree funding rates were in the bottom five in the country. 

 

Even before this recession, Washington ranked third in the nation as an importer of bachelors degrees and above. 

  

The outstanding administration, faculty, and staff at our universities have worked incredibly hard to absorb the latest round of cuts.  You have received reports from us showing that our enrollments are up and that our students are, so far, getting the classes they need to graduate. 

 

Please do not let these reports fool you into thinking that things are O.K.   Please do not let the heroic efforts of our faculty and staff lull you into thinking that this situation is sustainable. 

 

Continued lack of funding will inevitably have a profoundly detrimental effect on the quality of the education our students receive. 

 

As our classes become fewer and bigger, the attention from faculty and hands-on opportunities our students receive will decline.

 

As we continue to cut advising, day care, and student health and counseling services, our current excellent retention and graduation rates will precipitously decline.

 

As greater and greater tuition increases partially replace reduced state funding, many of your constituents will have fewer opportunities to attend college.

 

In the next five to seven years, at least a quarter of our tenured faculty will retire.  Faculty across the country will be retiring in the same proportion.  Those states that have not cut their universities as badly as Washington has and those states who have had the foresight to invest in higher education will have a tremendous advantage in hiring new faculty.

 

The big losers in the current arrangements are your constituents and their children. This will be especially devastating for those in the middle classes and below.  Washington is a beautiful and desirable place to live, and businesses in this state will continue to be able to recruit the smart, prepared, and educated colleagues they need from the states that have invested in higher education.  Our continued malnourishment of our universities is putting Washington’s citizens and their children at a tremendous disadvantage in the competition for Washington’s best jobs. 

 

We understand that to a great extent we are preaching to the choir here.  We know that you know the value of 4-year higher education and that none of you wanted the cuts to our universities to be as devastating as they were.  And we know that, in a situation where the budget deficit gets bigger with each new revenue forecast, that we are just one of your many problems.  We know that you have incredibly difficult choices to make.

 

But while we cannot possibly solve all of the problems that face us, we will certainly not solve any of them unless we face them.  And here together today, we would like to suggest a couple of ways to have the conversation about higher education that will let us face our problems more honestly. 

 

It is extremely important that our students are with us here today.  Too often people speak of the universities and our students as though we are separable.  Too often we have been pitted against each other on the issue of tuition.  As our state support continues to decrease, the university leaderships have seen no alternative to higher tuition to keep their institutions from falling off a cliff.  And our students of course see higher tuition as a barrier to their education.  We’re here together today to say that the best and only way to keep public four-year education affordable is to dramatically increase state support. 

 

In the same way, too often our universities have been pitted against other sectors of public education.  Too often when we are making the case for our universities we are asked if we think the money should be taken from K-12.  Pitting us against our other education colleagues is false and unproductive.  Mary and Sandra are here today to support us, just as we support them.  All public education in this state is desperately underfunded, and simply cutting one sector to partially fund another does nothing to help any of our students. 

 

We all understand that the problems you face are monumental and that no immediate, genuine solution is presenting itself.  But pretending that we are not on the same side as our students or our other education colleagues is not helpful and does not get us any closer to a real solution.

 

Obviously public education in this state cannot be adequately funded without serious and sustained attention to increasing state revenues.  We are happy to join those conversations and offer our advice about what impacts any revenue options will have on higher education.  Those of us here today not encumbered with those pesky regulations about state agencies are happy to join you even more vigorously in those conversations.

 

The other way that we would like to try to redirect the higher education conversation is around questions of innovation, accountability, and reform.  We are all for these things, but they cannot be understood as substitutes for the funding that we need.  Too often in bad times we imagine that we can cut funding and just do things differently and everything will be O.K.  If we just eliminate waste or if we teach more courses online, or if we offer 4-year degrees at 2-year colleges, we can cut a hundred million dollars from our regional universities and produce even more high quality degrees.  That kind of thinking won’t work. 

 

The stubborn fact is that our high retention and graduation rates, our high quality ratings, and our low costs make it clear that we are among the most efficient and cost effective universities in the country.  Our faculty were using technology to improve our teaching and providing online learning opportunities long before corporate education companies began to explore these things as sources of profit. 

 

During the upcoming legislative session you will be receiving two studies along with recommendations from the HEC Board—a system design study and a tuition study.  Both of these studies are competent, thorough, and contain some interesting recommendations.  But these studies should not distract us from the major concern of excellent universities that are on the brink of destruction.  These studies should be understood as footnotes to the problem of inadequate funding.

 

We are of course always looking for new efficiencies and things we can do better.  What we are not looking for are ways to simply do things more cheaply at the expense of the quality of the education of our students. 

 

At Central, Eastern, Evergreen, and Western we continue to be committed to the mission of public universities.  Our job is to provide world-class education to all of the public who want it, not just those who can afford it.  We don’t just train people for jobs, we educate them for careers and community leadership.  We don’t just train the workforce, we educate the citizenry.  Reinvesting in our state universities is reinvesting in the state at a time when we most need it.

   

If four-year higher education in Washington is to survive, all of us—students, faculty, staff, administration, and alumni need to come together and make our voices heard in Olympia.  Join us now in the effort...

 

Image